Policy of appeasement cause the second world war history essay

It is seen as a policy of one-sided concessions to an aggressor state, often at the expense of third parties, with nothing offered in return except promises of better behaviour in the future.

Effects of appeasement

Hitler also spoke out against the unfairness of the Versailles treaty. He believed that the Treaty of Versailles had treated Germany badly and that there were a number of issues associated with the Treaty that needed to be put right. By 3 September , Britain was once again at war with Germany. Perhaps the clearest example came in when Hitler took the gamble as to reoccupy the Rhineland. Chamberlain believed that, faced with the prospect of war against Britain and France, Hitler would stop his aggression. This was not the case in Germany! With Chamberlain following appeasement, this meant that no effort would be made until too late. The Czech government was not invited to the conference and protested about the loss of the Sudetenland. In fact perhaps the Policy of Appeasement should have never been put into action at all. However, countries were reluctant to get involved and risk provoking an aggressive country into taking direct action against them and failed to provide troops. You chose dishonour and you will have war. Failure of Appeasement Appeasement means giving in to someone provided their demands are seen as reasonable.

Hitler was not a man of his word and in March invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia. The German people were very unhappy about the treaty and thought that it was too harsh.

The Spanish Civil War is the name given to the struggle between loyalist and nationalist Spain for dominance in which the nationalists won and suppressed the country for the following thirty nine years.

This proved to be exceptionally useful.

policy of appeasement definition

The main reasons for the failure of the League of Nations can be summarised into the following points: Not all countries joined the League Although the idea for the League of Nations had come from Woodrow Wilson, there was a change of government in the United States before the signing of the treaty and the new Republican government refused to join.

Woodrow Wilson wanted a treaty based on his point plan which he believed would bring peace to Europe.

history revealed appeasement

In OctoberItaly invaded Abyssinia. Advertisement Chamberlain hoped that it would bring a quicker end to the crisis created in Europe by the Nazi clamour for revision of the Treaty of Versailles.

Chamberlain believed that, faced with the prospect of war against Britain and France, Hitler would stop his aggression.

How world war 1 led to world war 2

This proved to be exceptionally useful. Yet neither France nor Britain was prepared to start another war. The only use it came to was the time it bought to rearm, yet they would have never have had to give away the Sudetenland and lose valuable allies if Appeasement had never been brought up, or at least to only follow legitimate grievances. The Japanese government were told to order the army to leave Manchuria immediately. It was also argued that a stronger Germany would prevent the spread of Communism to the west. The Munich Agreement, signed by the leaders of Germany, Britain, France and Italy, agreed that the Sudetenland would be returned to Germany and that no further territorial claims would be made by Germany. By 3 September , Britain was once again at war with Germany. However, the trade restrictions were not carried out because they would have little effect. World War II played a very important role in the development of Trinidad and Tobago in terms of social, cultural, economic and political changes. Had World War II ended before May as many had hoped, history would now know Churchill as an average First Lord with an embarrassing share of responsibility for the failures of the Norwegian campaign.
Rated 5/10 based on 78 review
To What Extent did Appeasement Cause World War 2?