Writing a college history paper with citation
Note that in all three of these sample sentences the passive voice focuses the reader on the receiver of the action rather than on the doer on Kennedy, not on American voters; on McKinley, not on his assassin; on King Harold, not on the unknown Norman archer.
The opposite of win is lose, not loose.
A strong conclusion adds something to what you said in your introduction. If you do not cover all aspects, then you are not responding fully to the assignment.
Types of historical writing
In order to answer these, you will also have to consider two additional questions: What was the New Deal? Is there any reason to believe that the document is not genuine or not exactly what it appears to be? This is a common problem, though not noted in stylebooks. Is the source base substantial, or does it look thin? Hearing your own words, or having someone else listen to them, can help you identify run-on sentences, awkward phrasing, and other problems that might otherwise escape your attention. As a result, there is a great deal of garbage on the Web. Your completed outline might look like this: Thesis: Although the New Deal did not end the Depression, it was a success in restoring public confidence and creating new programs that brought relief to millions of Americans. If you are making a comparison, you use the conjunction than. A clause beginning with although cannot stand alone as a sentence. Did the author write it at the time of the event being discussed, or later on? For example, has it been treated as important or as a minor scrap of paper?
Misuse of instead. Not all primary sources are written.
Also, the adverb very will rarely strengthen your sentence. Even if you do not have to do outside research and are limited to working with the readings you have done in class, annotating sources is still very useful.
based on 26 review